What is better than Intel Core Amd. Comparison of AMD and Intel processors: which is better. The best processors in terms of performance and price

The eternal battle between the two most popular PC processor manufacturers - AMD and INTEL - makes you wonder which CPU you should ultimately choose. And if this doesn’t matter much for office tasks, then gaming builds are a different matter. To understand which is better, you need to know how the CPUs of these brands differ. The article is just about this.

Gaming Processor Specifications

In principle, the frequency characteristics of processors of both brands are very close to each other, and therefore it is difficult to determine which option is better for games in this case: in terms of frequency, there is not much difference in what to choose.

Architecture

Everything here is quite banal. The more modern the processor model, be it a device from Intel or AMD, the more games it will handle. In addition, models of the latest generations of CPUs from both companies will be sufficient.

It would be nice to put in a gaming computer: Core i5 (type) or i7 of at least the seventh generation or A8, FX, Ryzen versions:

1. Zen, Zen+;
2. Vishera;
3. Raven Ridge (sort of) and Pinnacle Ridge.

Cores and threads

A very important thing. A small number of cores can limit the performance of a discrete video adapter so that you won’t be able to play quietly. It’s not for nothing that the developers of most modern games point out that for comfortable gameplay, at least on minimum graphics settings, you need . Among such games are the third The Witcher and the fifth GTA.

Interesting about GTA V: this game is one of the few that can use all 8 CPU cores. The 4-core version in this case is inferior to the 6-core by 6.9%, and the eight-core by 11%.

It's also worth remembering about multithreading. The more threads, the more powerful the processor. Fortunately, this technology is now supported by devices from both AMD and AMD.

Advice: for comfortable gameplay, it is better to install a video adapter and CPU that support DirectX 12 in a gaming computer. However, it is worth remembering that if with DirectX 11 there is no significant difference in the number of cores and threads, then with the new software it is very noticeable: in this case, multithreading and the number CPU "heads" are very important.

Cache

Each processor device has a certain amount of cache memory of different levels (up to four). The first and second levels of the cache bus depend on the CPU architecture, but the third level cache can change in different models. The amount of this type of memory affects performance, but not so much that it is noticeable during gameplay.

Overclocking capability

Overclocking or overclocking allows you to raise the CPU frequency above the Turbo mark. Such processors are produced by both AMD and INTEL. Of course, this improves CPU performance. Intel “stones”, which are equipped with an unlocked multiplier, are marked with the letters K and X in the name, and AMD - X. For example, the Core i5-7600K.

Recommendation: If you want to save money, then the possibility of overclocking can be neglected. Overclocker versions are much more expensive with equal characteristics. In addition, gamers will most likely need to buy more powerful ones.

Built-in video adapter

When configuring a computer for gaming, the video card plays an important role. After all, the quality of graphics depends on it. Manufacturer Intel always integrates a graphics adapter into the CPU, but with AMD it may be different: built-in graphics are not always available. needed in any case, but if you want to save money or the user simply plans to buy an additional GPU later, then it’s worth taking a closer look at Intel processors: you won’t be able to make a mistake and choose an option without an integrated card.

Comparison of AMD and INTEL

From the previous sections it is clear that the differences between the modern models of the two competitors are not that significant. To understand which processor is best to choose for gaming, you should compare them in action. Below is a table with test results for top CPUs from both manufacturers.

Tests
3DMark Time Spy (DX12)	7137	6726	7270	7360
Graphics Score	7151	7017	7120	7171
CPU Score	7061	5449	8261	8660
CPU Test	23.73 fps	18.31 fps	27.76 fps	29.1 fps
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra	5201	5142	5246	5216
Total War: Warhammer Full HD	71.7 fps	109.2 fps	75.1 fps	91.2 fps
Total War: Warhammer Ultra HD	46.7 fps	47.1 fps	48.84 fps	46.5 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider Full HD	113.81 fps	111 fps	116.54 fps	135.14 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider Ultra HD	48.06 fps	45.73 fps	48.92 fps	48.61 fps
Doom Full HD	125,982 fps	109,987 fps	131,184 fps	147,324 fps
Doom Ultra HD	72,846 fps	71,343 fps	74,765 fps	73,689 fps

Both AMD and Intel are suitable for modern games; these brands have lines of powerful processors with almost identical characteristics in the same price segments.

The classic debate about which processor to choose between Intel and AMD becomes even more lively when it comes to the gaming configuration of the computer system. These two companies are giants of the computer industry in their own way, so it is quite difficult to identify a leader among them.

Having spent quite impressive sums on the purchase of a powerful processor for a gaming PC, the user has the right to demand an appropriate return from it. In the end, how smoothly games will launch and run will largely depend on the processor. The debate about which solution is better can be boiled down to two main points:

• analogues have similar characteristics, but at the same time may differ in price;
• how much higher a person is willing to pay for higher performance.

AMD or Intel for games? Which processor is best for a gaming computer?

CPU clock speed

Most modern processors from Intel, including the Intel Core i7, have a clock frequency of 2.70 to 3.60 GHz. Likewise, most AMD processors have a frequency of about 4.5 GHz. As you can see, the speed in the top lines of processors from both manufacturers is very high, which can cover the shortcomings of each processor performance architecture; this all boils down to the fact that the clock frequency no longer affects the same as, for example, a few years ago.

Processor cost

Of course, AMD unconditionally wins in this regard; its models are cheaper and more accessible than those of its competitor. AMD FX processors start at $100 and are good for gaming.

Currently, you can choose the AMD FX-6300 or FX-6350, which costs about $120, which is about 15% cheaper than the Intel i3, meaning it can be used to build a budget gaming computer. Once the $150 budget is exceeded, Intel's solutions usually become more attractive due to their higher performance, but there is always an exception to the rule. In fact, similar gaming performance between AMD and Intel comes with similar prices, which rarely fluctuate.

The difference in price often convinces the average person that the more expensive the better. But not everything is so simple; some users notice that performance should be sufficient, not excessive. And we must admit that for most tasks, the performance of mid-segment processors will be quite sufficient. So is it worth paying a large sum, sometimes twice as much, for power that turns out to be unclaimed? In this regard, it is a matter of perspective and financial security of the buyer.

Some users choose a more budget-friendly option because its performance will be enough for gaming, while others prefer to shell out for a more famous and powerful product. Typically, AMD is the leader in the mid-price segment, but this is also not the rule.

Integrated (built-in) video adapter

The video card is of great importance in the gaming configuration of the computer, directly affecting the quality of graphics. Of course, an integrated video adapter does not have its due importance in modern high-performance games, but for budget-saving and casual games it will be the best option.

It is worth noting that 75% of overall gaming performance depends on the graphics card. Although both processors use excellent, integrated high-quality video adapters, to obtain the highest realism, you should take care of purchasing a video card separately.

Overclocking potential

Processors, as a rule, have a fixed frequency and overclocking potential. However, gamers prefer processors with the ability to increase clock speeds, allowing them to get better performance and impact in games. This feature is called “overlocking” or, more simply, processor overclocking. The basic principle is the ability to increase the clock frequency above the base.

If you are a fan of using the overclocking potential of the processor, then AMD is the preferable option as it may seem at first glance, since they are in the modern FX line, usually have an unlocked multiplier, a larger number of cores, albeit at a slightly lower operating speed.

Intel processors, as a rule, have a locked clock frequency and, therefore, are not suitable for fans of fine-tuning processor tuning, but everything can be decided by purchasing a processor with an unlocked multiplier, while the cost, as well as the processor frequency, will also increase, not to mention the purchase of additional cooling and dedicated specifically for overclocking the motherboard, which in principle may also be characteristic of AMD.

Other factors to consider when choosing a processor

When deciding whether to choose AMD or Intel for games when comparing these processors, it is important that they are compared on similar platforms and in the same price segment. The size of RAM, motherboard characteristics and all other parameters must be identical. Only these subtleties can identify a specific leader, even in a synthetic test.
Various tests will show that, on average, both processors are equally good, although Intel performs some tasks a little faster, but the price is most likely a little higher. But the main conclusion should be that the gamer should get the optimal price-to-feature ratio. PC gamers understand that small differences are really minor and may not make up for a big difference in price.

In addition, by saving a little on the processor and buying a product from AMD, you can spend the extra money on a good video card, the performance of which can make a lot more difference in games.

Which AMD or Intel processor should you choose for modern games?

When choosing a processor, first of all, decide on your needs and capabilities. From a neutral point of view, if the high price does not bother you, of course choose Intel. If you are financially strapped but still want to buy a processor with almost equal efficiency and performance, AMD will be the best choice. In addition, processor versions vary greatly; it is necessary to familiarize yourself with the prices of a particular product in advance and, if possible, not neglect reviews and synthetic tests.

Hello everyone, friends! Today the topic of the article will concern such a part of the computer as the processor. When choosing a PC, beginners often face the question: which processor is better to choose Intel or AMD? Usually, everything comes down to financial resources, but there are some nuances that every user needs to know about when choosing a computer. Let's find out which is better, Intel or AMD.

It's almost 2017, friends! Happy New Year everyone! Surely many are thinking about upgrading their car for the holidays or buying for the first time a normal one with a good processor, video card, power supply, RAM, etc. Choosing a processor is an important step when purchasing a computer, so you must decide for yourself one hundred percent correctly according to your needs. There are two mega-leaders in the processor industry - Advanced Micro Devices, which produces AMD microprocessors, and Intel Corporation, which produces Intel microprocessors, respectively. The competition between these giants is colossal, however, they are on par with each other.

AMD Past and Present

Once upon a time in the 2000s, AMD processors got hot during operation, like irons, and if the cooler failed, they completely burned out. It was almost impossible to overclock such stones, since by raising the clock frequency, the processor immediately began to overheat. By the way, don’t miss the instructions about. While AMD processors were heating up, Intel processors behaved quite confidently, not knowing what overheating even was. Now 2017 is coming and AMD microprocessors are equipped with excellent thermal protection, so if you heard somewhere that they overheat, do not believe it, because this was almost twenty years ago. Also, AMD processors today can be overclocked without problems, especially the Black Edition series.

By the way, if your central processor is really overheating, then know that this is influenced by one or more factors:
- the cooling radiator is teeming with dust;
- thermal paste that has dried out over time (especially low-quality thermal paste);
- malicious software that constantly loads the processor to its maximum value;
- failed power supply, etc.

AMD vs Intel: fight for the top

To determine for yourself which processor is better than amd or intel, you need to set a goal for what the computer is being assembled in general (for games, office, what programs the user will often work in, etc.). It just so happens that AMD processors have always been lower in price than products from Intel. If you want to save money when building a computer, I advise you to purchase a central processor from AMD. If you want to build a more powerful computer, then it makes more sense to buy a product from Intel. In terms of operation, both Intel and AMD will last a long time, provided that the power supply does not fail or the processor does not overheat due to improper overclocking.

Each processor has its own advantages and disadvantages. Let's look at the main ones.

Pros and cons of Intel and AMD processors

Processors from Intel
Positive sides:
- work with RAM is better than that of AMD microprocessors,
- many programs and games are optimized specifically for Intel products,
- power consumption is lower than that of AMD processors,
- as a rule, performance is higher when performing computational operations within one program (when unzipping, converting, video editing, etc.).

Negative sides:
- when a new line of products from Intel is released, you have to change the motherboard due to a change in the socket (by the way, you don’t know - read the instructions),
- high price,
- when using two or more resource-intensive programs, processor performance drops,
- stones with the prefix “K”, as a rule, get quite hot, so such processors must have a good cooling system,
- when replacing a processor with a new one, you will have to purchase not only it, but also other components.

Processors from AMD
Positive sides:
- since 2008, most AMD processors can squeeze out gains of up to 20% when overclocked,
- it is possible to change the voltage in each of the processor cores,
- every user can purchase a product from AMD due to its affordable price,
- excellent price-quality ratio,
- when working in two or more powerful programs, there is no significant decline in performance,
- when replacing a processor from this manufacturer with a new one, there is no need to change the motherboard.

Negative sides:
- all applications designed for Intel processors work worse on PCs with AMD,
- processors from the “FX” series need a good cooling system (a regular cooler that comes with the processor will not be able to cool it properly during overclocking),
- higher power consumption than Intel processors,
- gaming performance is lower than that of competing processors.

As you can see, friends, each processor has its own advantages and disadvantages, which compensate for each other and as a result, it is really difficult to say in general which one is better. For an ordinary user, the needs are the same, but for a gamer they are completely different, so in one situation it will be better to choose a processor from AMD, in another - Intel. I think now you will choose the right processor for yourself.

That's all, thank you for your attention! See you again!

Which is better - AMD processor or Intel processor? This issue is constantly the subject of heated debate on the Internet. Owners of components of one and another brand argue fiercely with each other, although in fact in most cases they dealt only with their “favorites”. Accordingly, during such a dialogue, it is not possible to establish the truth.

We will approach the comparison as an independent party and compare both solutions according to a number of distinctive parameters

Price policy

The first thing most people pay attention to is the price of the processor. After all, not everyone can afford to spend an extra hundred dollars on computer components, and it is not advisable to overpay in all cases.

AMD processors can be safely classified as middle and even economy class. If you are very limited in budget, but your goal is to assemble a current generation system, then you should give preference to this company. For example, a quad-core AMD FX-4350 with a frequency of 4.2 GHz costs about four and a half thousand rubles (as of the beginning of 2014), and the most expensive of the freely available AMD FX X8 9590 models costs just over ten thousand.

Intel took a different path, significantly increasing the prices of their processors. Therefore, they are unlikely to be an economical solution for the work computer of an accountant or office employee. The cost of mid-level Intel Core i5 and Intel Core i7 models ranges from six to ten thousand rubles (there are cheaper and more expensive configurations, but we won’t take them into account). The top six-core i7 on the s-2011, in general, costs from 32 thousand rubles. The difference with AMD's offerings is clearly not in Intel's favor, but everything falls into place when you look at both processors in action.

Working possibilities

What we buy a powerful processor for is its performance, speed, and ability to solve the tasks assigned to it. Let's see what both companies can offer their clients in this regard.

AMD, although not a stellar performer, offers an excellent cost-to-performance ratio. When configured correctly, everything works stably and does not cause any complaints. Multitasking is perfectly implemented - with an AMD processor you can easily run several applications at the same time: unpack an archive, surf the browser, play music in the player, install a repack of a game, and so on. A similar Intel model will show much more modest results in this regard. It is also worth paying attention to the predisposition to overclocking: the performance of most AMD processors can be increased without problems by 10-20% compared to factory settings using standard software tools.

With the exception of multitasking, Intel is ahead of AMD in everything. Already due to the fact that application and game developers optimize their creations specifically for this brand of processors, Intel’s performance is significantly higher. In addition, the clock speed of the second and third level memory is much faster, and work with RAM is implemented at the highest level. Working with 3D graphics, editing photos and videos, and other resource-intensive tasks - it is recommended to use Intel solutions for these purposes (as long as one running application is active, there is a significant increase in performance). For the same reason, Intel is the favorite brand of processors among computer game players, where CPU power plays the second most important role after the power of the video card.

Energy consumption and heat dissipation

A very important criterion not only for those who want to save money, but also for owners, for example, of laptops. The lower the power consumption, the longer the device will last without recharging. With heat generation, everything is clear - overheating leads to interruptions in operation and failure of components.

AMD brand processors consume comparatively more energy than their competitors, which is why you need to be more careful when choosing a motherboard and power supply. Otherwise, critical problems, brakes, and freezes may occur. The same applies to heat dissipation, which is quite high (especially in older models), which is why the standard cooler supplied with the processor cannot cope with cooling under increased load. It is strongly recommended that when buying a CPU from AMD, you also purchase high-quality cooling from Zalman or another well-known company - it will also make much less noise during operation.

Intel. As I said earlier, in most cases they are much more economical and heat up less (average AMD ones are 125 Watts vs 95 Watts Intel ones). However, there were some exceptions here. The older Intel Core i5 and i7 models have already caught up with AMD's flagships and even exceeded their power consumption by 5 Watts with all the ensuing consequences. Now, buying a high-quality motherboard, power supply and good cooling has become a top priority for anyone who uses their computer to its full potential. After all, it’s one thing to come to terms with the loss of a cheap budget processor, and another thing to “lose a large sum of money.”

backward compatibility

The presence of backward compatibility in the processor allows it to be used with other computer components or software technologies that can already be called outdated.

AMD is focusing on multi-platform. That is, if you have an old motherboard with an AM2 or AM2+ socket, you can easily insert not only processors with the same name, but also AM3 solutions. For example, having a system with a combination of an m2n-mx motherboard and a Phenom X3 8450 processor, it is quite possible to remove the old processor and install a Phenom II X4 955, almost doubling the performance. Thus, AMD becomes an ideal option for lovers of step-by-step upgrades.

Intel processors, on the contrary, cannot be called universal. Each new line is released on a new platform (with the exception of LGA 1155 processors), which leads to the need to also replace the motherboard during the update. In principle, if you think logically, expensive solutions from Intel are bought not just to surf the Internet and watch movies, but for more resource-intensive tasks. That is, you cannot limit yourself to one processor - you need good RAM, a video card, and a powerful power supply. Therefore, it cannot be said that Intel’s single-platform nature is such a big drawback.

For several decades now, the debate about which manufacturer's processors are better has not subsided. Now comparing Intel and AMD processors is meaningless, since these companies cannot compete with the Russian MCST :). Elbrus are so good that they simply do not reach ordinary buyers, being snapped up almost instantly by organizations. Ordinary users have to be content with Intel and AMD processors on the “outdated” X86 architecture. Of course, they cannot stand comparison with MCST, but essentially there is nothing else to choose from. Because of this, it won't hurt to figure it out Which is better - AMD or Intel? by comparing them with each other.

Which is better for gaming: Intel or AMD?

Gaming performance has become the main criterion for choosing a processor for ordinary users. Many people generally assemble a computer just for gaming. In principle, we have more people who like to play than people who like to work! =)))

The performance of any more or less modern 8-thread (not cores, but threads!) processor is sufficient even for AAA projects. However, models with less thread should not be discounted - in many cases they cope well with games. Sometimes this is necessary. If gaming performance is limited by the capabilities of the video card (in the vast majority of cases), the requirements for the processor are even lower. The main thing is that it does not give freezes and stutters in games.

And yet, which company’s processors perform better in games? It is very difficult to answer this question unambiguously; ideally, you should always consider and compare specific models. In short, AMD's low- and mid-range processors are better than Intel's. In addition, AMD processors in general have a much better price/performance ratio. Intel is the undisputed leader in the highest price segment of desktop processors. The older processors of this company have the highest absolute performance in games.

It's worth noting that gaming performance is not indicative of overall processor performance. So AMD Ryzen shows rather modest results in games, significantly lagging behind Intel. In rendering and some other tasks, AMD is better than Intel (if we consider processors of equal cost).

Intel or AMD: which processor to choose for a laptop

Laptops, due to the requirements for high autonomy and low power consumption, receive significantly weakened “stuffing”. CPU performance and energy efficiency are very important to them.

In terms of energy efficiency, the leader in the laptop market is modern AMD processors. Already, Ryzen has a smaller die size than Intel processors. In 2019, AMD chips will begin to be produced using the 7nm standard. This will further reduce their size, which means increasing energy efficiency. Well, Intel just can’t master the 10nm process technology.

AMD-based laptops also have better price/performance ratio. The graphics built into its mobile processors are significantly superior to those from Intel. This provides a noticeable advantage, most pronounced in low-end laptops that do not have discrete graphics.

Intel mobile processors boast the highest absolute performance. The graphics processor built into them is quite weak compared to AMD. However, in the case of discrete graphics, this becomes unimportant.

Intel and AMD in 2019: clash of the titans

After AMD released its newest generation of processors based on the Zen architecture in 2017, a new round of confrontation between “red” and “blue” began. AMD Ryzen turned out to be such a successful product that Intel had to urgently increase the number of cores. The performance increase in the 8th generation of Intel processors reached 50%, while over the previous 5 years the “blue” giant offered an average of +5% in each new generation.

The increase in cores in the 8th generation of Intel seemed small. In the second half of 2018, it released the 9th generation of its desktop processors, the flagship of which has 8 physical cores and 16 threads. This was a response to the Ryzen 2 and possibly the upcoming Ryzen 3 next year.

Intel uses marketing successfully. So the company gave birth to a new line of processors, . Intel also emphasized at the presentation of its server processors that AMD Epyc does not have hardware support for AVX-512. By the way, there are literally only a few applications that support these instructions.

The confrontation between these titans affects all segments of the processor market. In the server market and in HEDT, both manufacturers offer solutions with a large number of cores. For example, AMD's current flagship in the server market, EPYC 7601, has 32 cores and 64 threads. Already in solutions based on the next Zen 2 architecture, AMD will increase the number of physical cores to 64 in server processors. AMD's HEDT flagship, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, has 32 physical cores. At this time, Intel's flagship, the Core i9-7980XE, competing with it, has only 18 cores.

What do you think about this? Which processor manufacturer would you buy and why? Please answer in the comments.

Did you read to the very end?

Was this article helpful?

Not really

What exactly did you not like? Was the article incomplete or false?
Write in comments and we promise to improve!